netcents2  MC-130J Commando IIs conduct low-level formation training  netcentsii
netcents-2  netcentsii NETOPS
netcents-2  Thunderbirds at Las Vegas airshow netcentsii
netcents2  Airman advances through green smoke cover during building clearance training,  netcentsii
Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES Old picture of drones netcentsii
Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES  Chief Master Sgt. Paul Koester freefalls from the C-17 Globemaster III ramp into a high-altitude low-opening parachute deployment  netcentsii
Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES  USAF photo:  F-16 on afterburner     netcentsii
Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES  USAF photo: F-15 flying over cloud bank  netcentsii
Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES A crew chief taxis in an MQ-1 Predator remotely piloted aircraft netcentsii
Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES   preflight check on a C-130H Hercules netcentsii
Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES  Oklahoma ANG personnel help tornado victims in Moore, OK  netcentsii
Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES   Pilot hugs his children Rylie and Carter after returning from a deployment   netcentsii
netcents2  A-10 Thunderbolt deploys flares   Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES
Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES  Members of the Security Forces Squadron respond to a ground attack   netcentsii
netcents2  F-35 completes a series of night flights   netcentsii
Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES
Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES
A-10 firing Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES
Thunderbirds Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES
Special Tactics Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES
Tuskegee airman rearms P-51 Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES
P-51 Mustang  Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES
Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES
Mt Rushmore Color Guard Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES
F-22 Raptor on runway Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES
B-52 Stratofortress Netcents-2, netcentsii, App services, NETOPS, Air Force Small business, EISM, PEO-BES

All NETCENTS-2 Application Services Protests Sustained

GAO announces decisions in the NETCENTS-2 Application Services Protests.

“DECISION
Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC), of Falls Church, Virginia; HP Enterprise Services, LLC, of Plano, Texas; Harris IT Services Corporation, of Herndon, Virginia; and Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc., of McLean, Virginia, protest the award of multiple contracts by the Department of the Air Force under request for proposals (RFP) No. FA8771-09-R-0020, for the acquisition of a wide array of information technology services and products. The protesters generally assert that the agency misevaluated the proposals and made unreasonable source selection decisions. HP additionally alleges that the agency conducted inadequate and unequal discussions.

We sustain the protests.

DIGEST

1. Agency’s cost realism analysis is not supported where evaluation record is devoid of any analysis of the sufficiency of the offerors’ proposed labor categories and labor hours, or meaningful explanation concerning the agency’s basis for accepting the proposed labor hours as realistic to complete the work.

2. Protest challenging agency’s technical evaluation is sustained where the record does not establish that the evaluation considered the appropriateness and reasonableness of the offerors’ labor mixes and labor hours, as required by the solicitation.

3. Protest that past performance evaluation was unreasonable is sustained where agency used a methodology to determine performance confidence ratings that significantly overemphasized relevancy-related criteria over quality, and produced misleading results.

4. Agency’s tradeoff decision considering past performance and cost/price was unreasonable where the past performance evaluation methodology produced misleading results, and where the source selection was in part based on considerations not set forth in the solicitation’s best value award criteria.

5. Protest that agency failed to conduct meaningful discussions concerning price reasonableness is denied where the source selection decision did not consider protester unawardable due to price; protest that agency conducted unequal discussions is denied where post-discussions exchanges with one offeror did not permit modification or revision of that offeror’s proposal.”